<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the plea for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing the need for a liberal approach in such matters. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanation satisfactory, especially with the production of a medical certificate for the incapacitated Accountant. The Tribunal also waived the pre-deposit condition under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, allowing the appeal to proceed. It criticized the Commissioner for not accepting the reasonable explanation provided by the appellant, highlighting the importance of considering evidence like medical certificates in condonation cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the plea for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing the need for a liberal approach in such matters. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanation satisfactory, especially with the production of a medical certificate for the incapacitated Accountant. The Tribunal also waived the pre-deposit condition under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, allowing the appeal to proceed. It criticized the Commissioner for not accepting the reasonable explanation provided by the appellant, highlighting the importance of considering evidence like medical certificates in condonation cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>