<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 351 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215666</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, ruled in a case concerning service of Orders-in-Original that the appellants were properly served the orders, rejecting their claim of non-receipt due to an address discrepancy. The Tribunal found no valid reason for condoning the delay in filing appeals, leading to the dismissal of the applications for condonation of delay, stay applications, and appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 351 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215666</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, ruled in a case concerning service of Orders-in-Original that the appellants were properly served the orders, rejecting their claim of non-receipt due to an address discrepancy. The Tribunal found no valid reason for condoning the delay in filing appeals, leading to the dismissal of the applications for condonation of delay, stay applications, and appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>