<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 347 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh review. The denial of CENVAT Credit on various services received by the appellant was questioned, emphasizing the need for reevaluation based on the appellant&#039;s business activities and the verification of original bills/invoices. The Tribunal highlighted errors in the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision regarding duty exemption for ship manufacturing, stressing the importance of following principles of natural justice. The case outcome focused on setting aside the previous order and emphasizing a reconsideration of the issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 347 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh review. The denial of CENVAT Credit on various services received by the appellant was questioned, emphasizing the need for reevaluation based on the appellant&#039;s business activities and the verification of original bills/invoices. The Tribunal highlighted errors in the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision regarding duty exemption for ship manufacturing, stressing the importance of following principles of natural justice. The case outcome focused on setting aside the previous order and emphasizing a reconsideration of the issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>