<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 343 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide sufficient cause for the delay. The appellant&#039;s negligence in informing the management about the impugned order and discrepancies in the affidavit led to the dismissal. Consequently, the penalties imposed were upheld as the stay petition and appeal were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 343 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide sufficient cause for the delay. The appellant&#039;s negligence in informing the management about the impugned order and discrepancies in the affidavit led to the dismissal. Consequently, the penalties imposed were upheld as the stay petition and appeal were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>