https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215637 An unregistered agreement to sell relating to immovable property in Uttar Pradesh could not be enforced or proved by other evidence where registration was compulsory, and it could not be used indirectly to establish the main transaction. Leave to sue a company in liquidation for specific performance was also refused because, without a valid agreement recognizable in law, the proposed suit would be futile and would unnecessarily burden the winding-up process. A direction to execute a sale deed could not be granted independently of a legally effective agreement to sell, so no enforceable basis survived for compelling transfer outside the liquidation process. en-us Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215637 An unregistered agreement to sell relating to immovable property in Uttar Pradesh could not be enforced or proved by other evidence where registration was compulsory, and it could not be used indirectly to establish the main transaction. Leave to sue a company in liquidation for specific performance was also refused because, without a valid agreement recognizable in law, the proposed suit would be futile and would unnecessarily burden the winding-up process. A direction to execute a sale deed could not be granted independently of a legally effective agreement to sell, so no enforceable basis survived for compelling transfer outside the liquidation process. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215637