<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 310 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215625</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decision to remand the issue back to the Settlement Commission for reconsideration, stating that the current writ petition was premature. The petitioner was advised to seek appropriate reliefs after the Settlement Commission&#039;s reconsideration, leading to the disposal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 310 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215625</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decision to remand the issue back to the Settlement Commission for reconsideration, stating that the current writ petition was premature. The petitioner was advised to seek appropriate reliefs after the Settlement Commission&#039;s reconsideration, leading to the disposal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>