<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 307 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, determining that the payments to HP, AP(HK) were reimbursements of expenses without any income element. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source, was not considered &#039;an assessee in default&#039; under Section 201(1), and the imposition of interest under Section 201(1A) was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 307 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, determining that the payments to HP, AP(HK) were reimbursements of expenses without any income element. Consequently, the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source, was not considered &#039;an assessee in default&#039; under Section 201(1), and the imposition of interest under Section 201(1A) was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>