<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 303 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the cross-appeals by the assessee, addressing issues related to penalty deletion, foreign travel expenses disallowance, and expenses under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D of the Act. The decisions were based on legal interpretations, past rulings, and the specific circumstances of each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 303 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the cross-appeals by the assessee, addressing issues related to penalty deletion, foreign travel expenses disallowance, and expenses under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D of the Act. The decisions were based on legal interpretations, past rulings, and the specific circumstances of each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>