https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215610 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license of the appellant, a customs house agent firm, due to alleged involvement in customs duty evasion related to the import of Polyester Fabrics declared as Embroidery Fabrics. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence proving the appellant or their directors were aware of the actions of the temporary employee responsible for replacing the samples, undermining the basis for the revocation. The decision was influenced by the exoneration by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the lack of appeal by the revenue department, leading to the grant of the appeal with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215610 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA license of the appellant, a customs house agent firm, due to alleged involvement in customs duty evasion related to the import of Polyester Fabrics declared as Embroidery Fabrics. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence proving the appellant or their directors were aware of the actions of the temporary employee responsible for replacing the samples, undermining the basis for the revocation. The decision was influenced by the exoneration by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the lack of appeal by the revenue department, leading to the grant of the appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215610