<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 292 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215607</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Tribunal&#039;s order directing the petitioner to deposit a penalty amount, finding it unjustified. The Court emphasized that once the pre-deposit condition was waived for the petitioner, the appeal could not be automatically dismissed for non-deposit by another party. The Tribunal&#039;s lack of reasons for changing its stance led the Court to modify the stay order, upholding the waiver of pre-deposit for the petitioner. This decision allowed the appeal to proceed on its merits without the immediate deposit requirement, providing relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 292 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215607</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Tribunal&#039;s order directing the petitioner to deposit a penalty amount, finding it unjustified. The Court emphasized that once the pre-deposit condition was waived for the petitioner, the appeal could not be automatically dismissed for non-deposit by another party. The Tribunal&#039;s lack of reasons for changing its stance led the Court to modify the stay order, upholding the waiver of pre-deposit for the petitioner. This decision allowed the appeal to proceed on its merits without the immediate deposit requirement, providing relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>