<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 287 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215602</link>
    <description>The appellate authority rejected a portion of the respondent&#039;s refund claim for unutilized CENVAT credit on service tax paid for certain taxable services used in exporting output services. The authority stressed the need for a nexus between input and output services, requiring a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate for verification. The appellate order was challenged on the grounds of jurisdiction, with the Tribunal ruling that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked the power to remand the case, leading to the order being set aside. Despite this, the Tribunal upheld the requirement of a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate for refund claims exceeding Rs.5 crores, directing re-adjudication of the claim in compliance with the circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 287 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215602</link>
      <description>The appellate authority rejected a portion of the respondent&#039;s refund claim for unutilized CENVAT credit on service tax paid for certain taxable services used in exporting output services. The authority stressed the need for a nexus between input and output services, requiring a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate for verification. The appellate order was challenged on the grounds of jurisdiction, with the Tribunal ruling that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked the power to remand the case, leading to the order being set aside. Despite this, the Tribunal upheld the requirement of a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate for refund claims exceeding Rs.5 crores, directing re-adjudication of the claim in compliance with the circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>