<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 286 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215601</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that incentives received by the advertising agency, bad debt, and cash discount are not taxable under the relevant provisions. The tribunal emphasized the importance of actual receipt of consideration in determining tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 286 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215601</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that incentives received by the advertising agency, bad debt, and cash discount are not taxable under the relevant provisions. The tribunal emphasized the importance of actual receipt of consideration in determining tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>