<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 276 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215591</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill and the disallowance of the liability claim under section 41 for the relevant year. The ITAT concluded that the claimed goodwill depreciation was merely a book entry and not a commercial right, thus rejecting the depreciation claim. Additionally, the liability for rent payable was disallowed as it had not crystallized in the year under consideration, in line with section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 276 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215591</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill and the disallowance of the liability claim under section 41 for the relevant year. The ITAT concluded that the claimed goodwill depreciation was merely a book entry and not a commercial right, thus rejecting the depreciation claim. Additionally, the liability for rent payable was disallowed as it had not crystallized in the year under consideration, in line with section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>