<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 272 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215587</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the addition of expenses under section 69C of the Act for foreign tours, reducing the total addition to Rs.1,51,171. Additionally, the ITAT sustained the addition on account of low household withdrawals at Rs.91,243 but deleted the addition of undisclosed income reflected as a gift, except for Rs.2,17,510.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 272 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215587</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the addition of expenses under section 69C of the Act for foreign tours, reducing the total addition to Rs.1,51,171. Additionally, the ITAT sustained the addition on account of low household withdrawals at Rs.91,243 but deleted the addition of undisclosed income reflected as a gift, except for Rs.2,17,510.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>