<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 260 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the claim of the assessee regarding the withdrawal of interest under Section 244A of the Income-tax Act. It emphasized the statutory provisions and legislative intent of Section 244A(3), distinguishing it from interest under Section 234D. The judgment rejected analogies and inferences, clarifying that case laws related to Section 234D were not applicable. The doctrine of merger in tax liability variations was discussed, highlighting the authority of appellate or revisional orders in determining tax liabilities. Ultimately, the CO raised by the assessee was deemed legally and factually untenable, resulting in its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 260 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the claim of the assessee regarding the withdrawal of interest under Section 244A of the Income-tax Act. It emphasized the statutory provisions and legislative intent of Section 244A(3), distinguishing it from interest under Section 234D. The judgment rejected analogies and inferences, clarifying that case laws related to Section 234D were not applicable. The doctrine of merger in tax liability variations was discussed, highlighting the authority of appellate or revisional orders in determining tax liabilities. Ultimately, the CO raised by the assessee was deemed legally and factually untenable, resulting in its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>