<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 255 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting additional Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) liabilities on communication and traveling expenses. The Tribunal found that only telephone and mobile expenses are liable for FBT, not items like postage and courier charges. The correct reconciliation of figures led to the deletion of Rs. 50,83,448/- for communication expenses and Rs. 10,70,86,818/- for traveling expenses. Other issues, including interest and penalty proceedings, were deemed irrelevant following the resolution of the primary disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 255 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting additional Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) liabilities on communication and traveling expenses. The Tribunal found that only telephone and mobile expenses are liable for FBT, not items like postage and courier charges. The correct reconciliation of figures led to the deletion of Rs. 50,83,448/- for communication expenses and Rs. 10,70,86,818/- for traveling expenses. Other issues, including interest and penalty proceedings, were deemed irrelevant following the resolution of the primary disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>