<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 250 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215565</link>
    <description>The Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, involving the demerger of a company&#039;s division to another wholly-owned subsidiary. Compliance with relevant sections was met, objections by the Regional Director were dismissed, and the Court upheld the principle of Single Window Clearance. The Scheme was found to be in the interest of the companies, their members, and creditors, leading to the grant of prayers in the petitions and quantification of costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 250 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215565</link>
      <description>The Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, involving the demerger of a company&#039;s division to another wholly-owned subsidiary. Compliance with relevant sections was met, objections by the Regional Director were dismissed, and the Court upheld the principle of Single Window Clearance. The Scheme was found to be in the interest of the companies, their members, and creditors, leading to the grant of prayers in the petitions and quantification of costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>