<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 226 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06, upholding the deletion of additions under Section 40A(2)(b) of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the interest-free deposits made by the assessee to related parties were commercially expedient and not hit by the provisions of Section 40A(2)(b). Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-evaluate the adjustment of excise duty on closing stock for assessment year 2005-06 in accordance with the law, setting aside the issue for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 226 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06, upholding the deletion of additions under Section 40A(2)(b) of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the interest-free deposits made by the assessee to related parties were commercially expedient and not hit by the provisions of Section 40A(2)(b). Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-evaluate the adjustment of excise duty on closing stock for assessment year 2005-06 in accordance with the law, setting aside the issue for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>