<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 219 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215534</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a tax case involving the allocation of common expenditure between shipping and non-shipping businesses. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify TDS remittance details and the payment status of disputed expenses. The tribunal upheld the allocation of common expenditure due to lack of substantiating evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 219 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215534</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a tax case involving the allocation of common expenditure between shipping and non-shipping businesses. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify TDS remittance details and the payment status of disputed expenses. The tribunal upheld the allocation of common expenditure due to lack of substantiating evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>