<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 211 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215526</link>
    <description>A demand confirmed under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules was set aside because the assessee had already filed a pending application before the Commissioner seeking reversal of proportionate Cenvat credit on common inputs used in both dutiable and exempted final products. As the revenue raised no objection, the matter was remanded for fresh decision after disposal of that application under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 211 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215526</link>
      <description>A demand confirmed under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules was set aside because the assessee had already filed a pending application before the Commissioner seeking reversal of proportionate Cenvat credit on common inputs used in both dutiable and exempted final products. As the revenue raised no objection, the matter was remanded for fresh decision after disposal of that application under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>