<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 165 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215480</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions related to stock discrepancies and allow business expenses. However, the Court reversed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the levy of surcharge, ruling in favor of the revenue based on the retrospective application of the proviso to Section 113. The appeal was allowed in part, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 165 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215480</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions related to stock discrepancies and allow business expenses. However, the Court reversed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the levy of surcharge, ruling in favor of the revenue based on the retrospective application of the proviso to Section 113. The appeal was allowed in part, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>