<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 147 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215462</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to direct the assessing officer to re-calculate the indirect costs in accordance with the law. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 80HHC(3)(b) and emphasized the inclusion of all indirect costs in the calculation for trading transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 147 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215462</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to direct the assessing officer to re-calculate the indirect costs in accordance with the law. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 80HHC(3)(b) and emphasized the inclusion of all indirect costs in the calculation for trading transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>