<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 142 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215457</link>
    <description>Computer cases fitted with USB and audio ports on a PCB were held not to fall within the exclusion for a populated printed circuit board under Notification No. 21/2002. The Tribunal accepted the technical opinion that the PCB arrangement functioned only as an extension for connectivity and did not contain the active or passive electronic components needed to constitute a populated PCB. On that basis, the goods were outside the exclusion in Sl. No. 276 and qualified for the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 142 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215457</link>
      <description>Computer cases fitted with USB and audio ports on a PCB were held not to fall within the exclusion for a populated printed circuit board under Notification No. 21/2002. The Tribunal accepted the technical opinion that the PCB arrangement functioned only as an extension for connectivity and did not contain the active or passive electronic components needed to constitute a populated PCB. On that basis, the goods were outside the exclusion in Sl. No. 276 and qualified for the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>