<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 139 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, waived the pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Central Excise for fresh consideration after providing an opportunity of hearing to the appellant. The appeals were disposed of by way of remand, emphasizing the need for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 139 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, waived the pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Central Excise for fresh consideration after providing an opportunity of hearing to the appellant. The appeals were disposed of by way of remand, emphasizing the need for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>