<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215452</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order that dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit directive. The Tribunal remanded the case for a fresh hearing after the appellant deposited the full amount of Rs.25 lakhs and the Revenue acknowledged the procedural nature of the dismissal. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s unintentional non-compliance due to pursuing a writ petition against the deposit order, and the subsequent fulfillment of the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215452</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order that dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit directive. The Tribunal remanded the case for a fresh hearing after the appellant deposited the full amount of Rs.25 lakhs and the Revenue acknowledged the procedural nature of the dismissal. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s unintentional non-compliance due to pursuing a writ petition against the deposit order, and the subsequent fulfillment of the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>