<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 133 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215448</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality and legislative competence of the Union of India to impose service tax on renting of immovable property. It also deemed the retrospective application of the Finance Act, 2010, as valid, along with the circulars and notifications issued under the Finance Act, 1994, and 2010. The court dismissed the writ petitions and stay applications challenging these aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 133 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215448</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality and legislative competence of the Union of India to impose service tax on renting of immovable property. It also deemed the retrospective application of the Finance Act, 2010, as valid, along with the circulars and notifications issued under the Finance Act, 1994, and 2010. The court dismissed the writ petitions and stay applications challenging these aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>