<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 130 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215445</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of the additional evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s handling of evidence was found inadequate, and the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the genuineness of the additional evidence and make fresh orders. The tax case appeals were allowed, and the substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 130 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215445</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of the additional evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s handling of evidence was found inadequate, and the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the genuineness of the additional evidence and make fresh orders. The tax case appeals were allowed, and the substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>