<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 128 - ITAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing appeals challenging CIT(A)&#039;s orders, allowing the appeals to be heard on merits despite being time-barred. Regarding the enforcement of demand under section 201(1A) r.w.s. 194 C, the Tribunal emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to verify tax payments by the recipients before treating the deductor as an assessee in default. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer based on the clarified legal principles, setting aside the previous orders for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 128 - ITAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing appeals challenging CIT(A)&#039;s orders, allowing the appeals to be heard on merits despite being time-barred. Regarding the enforcement of demand under section 201(1A) r.w.s. 194 C, the Tribunal emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to verify tax payments by the recipients before treating the deductor as an assessee in default. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer based on the clarified legal principles, setting aside the previous orders for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>