<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 124 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal largely upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of disallowances, emphasizing the necessity and reasonableness of the expenses relative to the business turnover and past assessment practices. The only exception was the depreciation issue, which was remanded for fresh consideration by the AO. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 124 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal largely upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of disallowances, emphasizing the necessity and reasonableness of the expenses relative to the business turnover and past assessment practices. The only exception was the depreciation issue, which was remanded for fresh consideration by the AO. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>