<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 117 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215432</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2000-01, 2001-02, and 2002-03. Despite no revenue loss and resulting refunds, the court found tampering of records and income concealment justified penalties. The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the manipulation by the assessee and lack of merit in challenging the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 117 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215432</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2000-01, 2001-02, and 2002-03. Despite no revenue loss and resulting refunds, the court found tampering of records and income concealment justified penalties. The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the manipulation by the assessee and lack of merit in challenging the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>