<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 108 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215423</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on Karnataka Metal Company (KMC) under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, initially reduced from Rs.50,827/- and Rs.1,06,226/- to Rs.15,000/- and Rs.30,000/- in respective cases. The penalties were related to irregular CENVAT credit and statutory invoice issues. Despite challenges, penalties were upheld for KMC and another party, emphasizing compliance with excise rules and preventing misuse of credit facilities. M/s. Agarvanshi Aluminium Ltd.&#039;s appeal for similar violations resulted in a reduced penalty of Rs.12,000/-. The Tribunal affirmed penalties, highlighting the need for adherence to excise rules and appropriate penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 108 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215423</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on Karnataka Metal Company (KMC) under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, initially reduced from Rs.50,827/- and Rs.1,06,226/- to Rs.15,000/- and Rs.30,000/- in respective cases. The penalties were related to irregular CENVAT credit and statutory invoice issues. Despite challenges, penalties were upheld for KMC and another party, emphasizing compliance with excise rules and preventing misuse of credit facilities. M/s. Agarvanshi Aluminium Ltd.&#039;s appeal for similar violations resulted in a reduced penalty of Rs.12,000/-. The Tribunal affirmed penalties, highlighting the need for adherence to excise rules and appropriate penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>