<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 107 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215422</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on outdoor catering service used to serve employees was held admissible, and the departmental objection failed. The denial based on an alleged recovery of part of the catering cost from employees could not be sustained because that allegation was not made in the show-cause notice, so the objection was beyond its scope. The issue was also covered by a cited High Court decision in favour of the assessee, supporting eligibility of credit on the catering service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 107 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215422</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on outdoor catering service used to serve employees was held admissible, and the departmental objection failed. The denial based on an alleged recovery of part of the catering cost from employees could not be sustained because that allegation was not made in the show-cause notice, so the objection was beyond its scope. The issue was also covered by a cited High Court decision in favour of the assessee, supporting eligibility of credit on the catering service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>