<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215419</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders passed by the authorities below. It held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal without a fair hearing, the issue was debatable and not suitable for rectification under Section 154, and the proper construction of Section 40(b)(v) and Explanation 3 includes income from other sources in the net profit for computing partners&#039; remuneration. There was no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215419</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders passed by the authorities below. It held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal without a fair hearing, the issue was debatable and not suitable for rectification under Section 154, and the proper construction of Section 40(b)(v) and Explanation 3 includes income from other sources in the net profit for computing partners&#039; remuneration. There was no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>