<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 102 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs.50 lakhs for hearing the appeals within eight weeks, with remaining dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision with the requirement to provide proof of the directed deposit and ensure both parties had the opportunity to present evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 102 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs.50 lakhs for hearing the appeals within eight weeks, with remaining dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision with the requirement to provide proof of the directed deposit and ensure both parties had the opportunity to present evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>