<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 100 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that there was no liability to pay Service Tax before 18.4.2006, citing the enactment of Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. It emphasized judicial discipline in following previous decisions and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, clarifying the liability and upholding consistency in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 100 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that there was no liability to pay Service Tax before 18.4.2006, citing the enactment of Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. It emphasized judicial discipline in following previous decisions and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, clarifying the liability and upholding consistency in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>