<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 92 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215407</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made on account of low GP and the reduction in disallowance of telephone and vehicle expenses. The ITAT emphasized the lack of factual basis and justification for the AO&#039;s actions in rejecting the books of accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 92 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215407</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made on account of low GP and the reduction in disallowance of telephone and vehicle expenses. The ITAT emphasized the lack of factual basis and justification for the AO&#039;s actions in rejecting the books of accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>