<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 85 - ITAT, Jaipur</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It confirmed that compensation paid for land use is considered revenue expenditure, contributions to the workers&#039; safety net fund are deductible, and the claim for donations under Section 37(1) was not maintainable, both procedurally and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 07:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 85 - ITAT, Jaipur</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It confirmed that compensation paid for land use is considered revenue expenditure, contributions to the workers&#039; safety net fund are deductible, and the claim for donations under Section 37(1) was not maintainable, both procedurally and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>