<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 77 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that sought to include transportation charges in the assessable value under the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000. The Tribunal held that as per Rule 5 of the said Rules, transportation charges shown separately in the invoice should not be included in the assessable value. Finding no merit in the department&#039;s contention, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting relief and clarifying the correct interpretation of the valuation rules in relation to transportation charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 77 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that sought to include transportation charges in the assessable value under the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000. The Tribunal held that as per Rule 5 of the said Rules, transportation charges shown separately in the invoice should not be included in the assessable value. Finding no merit in the department&#039;s contention, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting relief and clarifying the correct interpretation of the valuation rules in relation to transportation charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>