https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215368 Interference with a CESTAT interlocutory pre-deposit order is warranted only where the condition causes excessive or substantial hardship or otherwise prejudices the right to be heard. On the facts stated, no such hardship was shown, and the findings below were not regarded as meritless. The Court therefore found no basis to disturb the direction requiring pre-deposit of part of the duty demand, and the challenge failed. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215368 Interference with a CESTAT interlocutory pre-deposit order is warranted only where the condition causes excessive or substantial hardship or otherwise prejudices the right to be heard. On the facts stated, no such hardship was shown, and the findings below were not regarded as meritless. The Court therefore found no basis to disturb the direction requiring pre-deposit of part of the duty demand, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215368