<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 36 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and reversed the addition confirmed as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of shareholding by the assessee in the loan-giving company and applied relevant legal precedents to support their decision. This case underscores the importance of meeting specific criteria under Section 2(22)(e) and the significance of legal precedents in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 36 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and reversed the addition confirmed as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of shareholding by the assessee in the loan-giving company and applied relevant legal precedents to support their decision. This case underscores the importance of meeting specific criteria under Section 2(22)(e) and the significance of legal precedents in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>