<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 7 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215321</link>
    <description>Duty credit scrip benefits under the Serve From India Scheme were available only during the scrip&#039;s currency, so customs duty exemption was unavailable where the shipment reached India after expiry of the authorization. Because the importer knew the relevant dates when contracting for the goods, refusal to extend the benefit or permit revalidation was not treated as unreasonable. The order of the Policy Relaxation Committee was also described as subject to a statutory appeal to the Central Government, and recourse to that remedy was permitted with liberty to seek consideration on merits if filed in time. The writ relief was refused, leaving the statutory appeal as the available remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 7 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215321</link>
      <description>Duty credit scrip benefits under the Serve From India Scheme were available only during the scrip&#039;s currency, so customs duty exemption was unavailable where the shipment reached India after expiry of the authorization. Because the importer knew the relevant dates when contracting for the goods, refusal to extend the benefit or permit revalidation was not treated as unreasonable. The order of the Policy Relaxation Committee was also described as subject to a statutory appeal to the Central Government, and recourse to that remedy was permitted with liberty to seek consideration on merits if filed in time. The writ relief was refused, leaving the statutory appeal as the available remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>