<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 4 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order-in-appeal confirming a demand and reducing penalty under Section 11AC of the Act. The appeal challenged the reduction of penalty, contending it should not have been reduced. The respondent&#039;s cross objections, arguing the demand was time-barred, were upheld. The case involved grey fabric processing by M/s. Shreehari Fabrics Ltd., with the demand alleged for 1995-1998 due to suppressed fabric value. Lack of evidence of connivance led to the demand being considered time-barred, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposal of cross objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 4 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order-in-appeal confirming a demand and reducing penalty under Section 11AC of the Act. The appeal challenged the reduction of penalty, contending it should not have been reduced. The respondent&#039;s cross objections, arguing the demand was time-barred, were upheld. The case involved grey fabric processing by M/s. Shreehari Fabrics Ltd., with the demand alleged for 1995-1998 due to suppressed fabric value. Lack of evidence of connivance led to the demand being considered time-barred, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposal of cross objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>