<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 2 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215316</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Revenue&#039;s applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals against specific entities. The Court emphasized the need for proper sanction and compliance with statutory provisions. Despite opportunities, the Revenue failed to produce a review order as required by law, leading to the dismissal of the condonation applications and subsequent appeals. The Court clarified that if the Board allows an appeal, the dismissal of the delay application would not prevent reapplication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 2 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215316</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Revenue&#039;s applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals against specific entities. The Court emphasized the need for proper sanction and compliance with statutory provisions. Despite opportunities, the Revenue failed to produce a review order as required by law, leading to the dismissal of the condonation applications and subsequent appeals. The Court clarified that if the Board allows an appeal, the dismissal of the delay application would not prevent reapplication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>