<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to finally dispose of the appeal after dispensing with the pre-deposit requirement. The original authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 42,11,371/- as CENVAT credit denied on specific items for a certain period, along with interest and an equal amount of penalty. The appellant&#039;s appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit directive, despite contesting the demand on grounds of limitation and change in belief. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit a specific amount within a deadline to enable a review on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to finally dispose of the appeal after dispensing with the pre-deposit requirement. The original authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 42,11,371/- as CENVAT credit denied on specific items for a certain period, along with interest and an equal amount of penalty. The appellant&#039;s appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit directive, despite contesting the demand on grounds of limitation and change in belief. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit a specific amount within a deadline to enable a review on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>