https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215312 In a service tax dispute, complete waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the applicant did not produce documentary proof that commission was received directly from mutual fund companies or that it acted as a mutual fund distributor or agent. The Tribunal treated the cited precedent as factually distinguishable and noted the absence of any plea of financial hardship. The claim based on Notification No. 13/2003-ST was not accepted for waiver purposes, and the applicant was required to deposit 25% of the service tax demanded within the stipulated time. en-us Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215312 In a service tax dispute, complete waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the applicant did not produce documentary proof that commission was received directly from mutual fund companies or that it acted as a mutual fund distributor or agent. The Tribunal treated the cited precedent as factually distinguishable and noted the absence of any plea of financial hardship. The claim based on Notification No. 13/2003-ST was not accepted for waiver purposes, and the applicant was required to deposit 25% of the service tax demanded within the stipulated time. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215312