<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 804 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee met the necessary conditions for claiming depreciation on the renovation, justified the traveling expenses as legitimate business expenditures, and complied with the requirements for exemption under section 10B. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 804 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee met the necessary conditions for claiming depreciation on the renovation, justified the traveling expenses as legitimate business expenditures, and complied with the requirements for exemption under section 10B. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>