<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 798 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed most issues raised by the appellant due to the absence of substantial questions of law or adherence to legal standards and past practices. Only the matter concerning the disallowance of expenses not related to the year under review was accepted for further deliberation. The judgment favored the respondent on issues such as corporate membership fees, unclaimed expenditure, excess provision for free service, and depreciation classification, citing compliance with legal criteria and consistent practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 798 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed most issues raised by the appellant due to the absence of substantial questions of law or adherence to legal standards and past practices. Only the matter concerning the disallowance of expenses not related to the year under review was accepted for further deliberation. The judgment favored the respondent on issues such as corporate membership fees, unclaimed expenditure, excess provision for free service, and depreciation classification, citing compliance with legal criteria and consistent practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>