<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 793 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215295</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty on the quantum addition of Rs. 4 lakhs for concealment of income based on unaccounted deposits, while deleting the penalty on the addition of Rs. 5 lakhs as it was explained in a subsequent assessment order. The A.O. was directed to re-calculate the penalty amount, resulting in the assessee&#039;s appeal being partly allowed with the penalty on the Rs. 5 lakhs addition being deleted and the penalty on the Rs. 4 lakhs addition being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 793 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215295</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty on the quantum addition of Rs. 4 lakhs for concealment of income based on unaccounted deposits, while deleting the penalty on the addition of Rs. 5 lakhs as it was explained in a subsequent assessment order. The A.O. was directed to re-calculate the penalty amount, resulting in the assessee&#039;s appeal being partly allowed with the penalty on the Rs. 5 lakhs addition being deleted and the penalty on the Rs. 4 lakhs addition being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>