<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 787 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that there was no valid reason for the rejection of accounts under section 145 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the application of a flat rate of net profit and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, as these issues were interconnected with the validity of the rejected accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 787 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that there was no valid reason for the rejection of accounts under section 145 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the application of a flat rate of net profit and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, as these issues were interconnected with the validity of the rejected accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>