<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 754 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215256</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and answering the substantial questions of law in favor of the assessee. It emphasized that the lease equalisation charge is a legitimate deduction as per accounting standards and reflects the real income of the assessee. The court also highlighted the importance of following RBI norms and ICAI guidelines in accounting practices for NBFCs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 754 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215256</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and answering the substantial questions of law in favor of the assessee. It emphasized that the lease equalisation charge is a legitimate deduction as per accounting standards and reflects the real income of the assessee. The court also highlighted the importance of following RBI norms and ICAI guidelines in accounting practices for NBFCs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>